Owner furnished (supplied) equipment (OFE), also known by other terms such as \u201cfree issue\u201d presents unique planning and scheduling challenges.\u00a0 The idea is that another party to the contract procures \/ orders and supplies equipment, material (even services, such as utilities or scaffolding) to the contractor.\u00a0 The notion is that the contractor receives the equipment, goods or services and then erects, installs or otherwise uses these items.<\/p>\n
The motivation for this type of arrangement can be one or more of several seemingly logical concepts.\u00a0 Equipment with long lead times for fabrication and delivery may be ordered in advance of placing a contract for the equipment erection or installation.\u00a0 Another motivation relates to cost savings.\u00a0 Some believe ordering equipment and commodities (bulk materials) can be done by a general contractor or owner (owner, developer, employer) and thereby save a markup by a subcontractor.\u00a0 In these cases, an interface is created between the ordering\/procurement entity and the execution (engineering, erection, installation, fabrication, etc.) entity.\u00a0 The creation of this interface becomes the issue.<\/p>\n
The obvious challenge here is to plan and manage around the interface with the supplying (or contract specified) party.\u00a0 These interfaces serve to amplify any issues (delivery, quality, design) that emerge.<\/p>\n
Large field erected and\/or integrated equipment is a common example.\u00a0 Done for reasons related to long lead time delivery, these pieces of equipment tend to be on or near the project\u2019s execution critical path.\u00a0 Ordered by an owner, expediting (monitoring and assessing progress) can be a challenge that some owners are not equipped to address.\u00a0 Accurate forecasting of fabrication and delivery is essential for erection contractor planning and scheduling.\u00a0 As issues arise, some owners are not equipped to detect these variations to plan (assuming there is a plan).\u00a0 Further, some react by obscuring variations with the expectations that other unrelated issues will result in delays that will mitigate or negate the impact of the equipment variation.<\/p>\n
In one case, the owner preordered a large piece of field erected and integrated equipment.\u00a0 As delays emerged and were (later) detected by the owner, the contract delivery obligation to the erection contractor became a problem.\u00a0 The action was to ship equipment in pieces, not assembled as anticipated by the erection contractor.\u00a0 This shifting of work from the factory to the field (and from the fabricator to the erection contractor) created a planning and scheduling issue.\u00a0 The problem was further aggravated by the remote location of the job site and the failure of the owner to disclose this action (in this case, inaction).\u00a0 Finally, fabrication defects were not detected in the shop (no shop erection) and the corrective work was transferred to the field.\u00a0 This added work aggravated the impacted schedule.<\/p>\n
In another case, the owner was obliged to supply a key utility.\u00a0 This utility was essential (and planned) for use in construction.\u00a0 As the contract date for this utility came and passed, the owner refused to supply mitigation measures and forecast dates for the supply of this service.\u00a0 This lack of information prevented action by the contractor to mitigate the owner\u2019s issue.<\/p>\n
In yet another case, a general contractor ordered commodity (bulk) materials for installation by specialty subcontractors.\u00a0 Untimely delivery of the commodities caused delays and disruptions to the subcontractor work.\u00a0 While the subcontractors in question did not have suitable project control procedures to detect and show \u201ccause and effect,\u201d the subcontract operated at a loss and claim resolution was required.\u00a0 This resolution was frustrated by the lack of effective project controls covering this key interface.<\/p>\n
The message and the conclusions regarding owner furnished equipment (free issue material) is that unique and aggressive planning and scheduling ways of working are necessary.\u00a0 These conclusions include:<\/p>\n
Introduction Owner furnished (supplied) equipment (OFE), also known by other terms such as \u201cfree issue\u201d presents unique planning and scheduling challenges.\u00a0 The idea is that another party to the contract procures \/ orders and supplies equipment, material (even services, such as utilities or scaffolding) to the contractor.\u00a0 The notion is that the contractor receives the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes"},"categories":[8],"tags":[70,71,69,68,60,66,67,64,65,13,258],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":285,"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283\/revisions\/285"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projectprofessionals.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}