US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

PROJECT PLANNING – Managerial Considerations (Part 1)

December 20, 2012 By George T McLaughlin PMP CCM

Introduction

After a long period [since March 2012] of inactivity, McLaughlin and McLaughlin is pleased to resume posting activity in this blog. Project Professionals is intended to offer advice and tips regarding various aspects of Program and Project Management. For a statement of blog Objectives and Goals, please follow this link.

During this inactive period, M&M has been performing two time-consuming assignments. One is program management support work on large Canadian oil sands investment/expansion program. The second is a construction claim on an international power plant project.

In considering the general topic of project planning, consider the following question. Why do so many projects experience serious negative issues, if not failure, when project planning has been pursued? Often the answer is that the plans are defective or ignored. Alignment, implementation and updating are essential features. Good quality plans must be developed and implemented. Often, this is not the case.

[Continued] [Read more…]

Filed Under: Claims, Featured, General, Projects, Uncategorized Tagged With: Best Practices, Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), Doctor Harold Kerzner, Earned Value Management, McLaughlin & McLaughlin, PMBOK, Preliminary Project Scope Statement, Project Charter, Project Execution Plan, Project Execution Planning, Project Initiation, Project Management Institute (PMI), Project Planning, Project Sponsor, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), www.mclaughlinandmclaughlin.com

RESOURCE CENTER UPGRADE

September 7, 2011 By d.mclaughlin

The purpose of this post is to advise readers that the Project Professionals Resource Center feature or page has been upgraded. Please visit this useful page and familiarize yourself with the content. Please visit the Resource Links page which provides links to useful industry tools and resources. The pages were derived from years of frustration searching for reliable, substantiated references. So, the desires to share our choices are listed on the noted pages.

The Resource Center feature of this McLaughlin and McLaughlin [M&M] blog provides blog visitors with information and links to important and useful publications that relate to project management and dispute resolution in project work.

Recently, the Resource Center was upgraded to include several new publications, cite a new version of Mr. Pickavance’s book on delay and add some useful Resource Link updates. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Claims, Featured, General, Projects, Uncategorized Tagged With: AACE International, ABA, Best Practice, Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), Construction Industry Institute (CII), Doctor Harold Kerzner, George T. McLaughlin PMP, Keith Pickavance, MCAA, McLaughlin & McLaughlin, NECA, PMBOK, Project Execution Plan, Project Execution Planning, Project Management, Project Management Institute (PMI), Project Planning, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

TIME MANAGEMENT – Schedule Specification Implementation (Part 6)

August 24, 2011 By George T McLaughlin PMP CCM

This Subject Series addresses the sources and implementation of a contract schedule specification. The Subject Series structure is presented in multiple parts and the series is a logical extension of the series titled MANAGING RISK OF DELAY. The intention is to capture sources of best practice in Time Management as it relates to implementing a professional schedule specification.

The overview of this series is:

Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Preparation and Maintenance (Part 4)
Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Specification Sources and Implementation (Part 8)
Schedule Specification Implementation Overview (Part 2)
Schedule Specification Implementation Specific Issues (Part 3)
Schedule Specification Implementation Weather Delays and Approved Schedule (Part 4)
Schedule Specification Implementation Claims Avoidance and Schedule Updates (Part 5)
Schedule Specification Implementation Recovery Plans and Conclusion (Part 6).

The balance of this post is from the paper. In general, this informative work compares two approaches to schedule specification implementation.

This extract from the paper covers:

RECOVERY PLANS
CONCLUSIONS [Read more…]

Filed Under: Claims, Featured, General, Projects Tagged With: Approved Schedule, Best Practices, Construction Contract Planning and Scheduling, construction time management, Corps of Engineers, CPM scheduling, Delay, George T. McLaughlin PMP, Managing risk of delay, McLaughlin & McLaughlin, Risk of Delay, Schedule Approval, Schedule Specification, Time Management, Time Management Strategy, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Weather Delays

TIME MANAGEMENT – Schedule Specification Implementation (Part 5)

August 19, 2011 By George T McLaughlin PMP CCM

This Subject Series addresses the sources and implementation of a contract schedule specification. The Subject Series structure is and will be multiple parts and be a logical extension of the series titled MANAGING RISK OF DELAY.

The overview of this series is:

Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Preparation and Maintenance (Part 4)
Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Specification Sources and Implementation (Part 8)
Schedule Specification Implementation Overview (Part 2)
Schedule Specification Implementation Specific Issues (Part 3)
Schedule Specification Implementation Weather Delays and Approved Schedule (Part 4)
Making State of the Art Scheduling Specifications Work (presented in multiple parts).

The balance of this post is from the paper. In general, this informative work compares two approaches to schedule specification implementation.

This extract from the paper covers:

PERIODIC SCHEDULE UPDATES
CLAIMS AVOIDANCE [Read more…]

Filed Under: Claims, Featured, General, Projects Tagged With: Approved Schedule, Best Practices, Claims, claims avoidance, construction claims avoidance, Construction Contract Planning and Scheduling, construction time management delay, George T. McLaughlin PMP, Managing risk of delay, McLaughlin & McLaughlin, Periodic schedule updates, Risk of Delay, Schedule Approval, Schedule Specification, Schedule Updates, Time Management, Time Management Strategy, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

TIME MANAGEMENT – Schedule Specification Implementation (Part 4)

August 15, 2011 By George T McLaughlin PMP CCM

This Subject Series addresses the sources and implementation of a contract schedule specification. The Subject Series structure is and will be multiple parts and be a logical extension of the series titled MANAGING RISK OF DELAY.

The overview of this series is:

Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Preparation and Maintenance (Part 4)
Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Specification Sources and Implementation (Part 8)
Time Management – Schedule Specification Implementation Overview (Part 2)
Time Management – Schedule Specification Implementation Specific Issues (Part 3) Making State of the Art Scheduling Specifications Work (presented in multiple parts).

The balance of this post and subsequent ones in this series are/will be from this paper. In general, this informative work compares two approaches to schedule specification implementation.

This extract covers:

WEATHER DELAYS
THE APPROVED SCHEDULE [Read more…]

Filed Under: Claims, Featured, General, Projects Tagged With: Approved Schedule, Best Practice, Construction Contract Planning and Scheduling, Construction Scheduling, George T. McLaughlin PMP, Managing risk of delay, McLaughlin & McLaughlin, Risk of Delay, Schedule Approval, Schedule Specification, Time Management, Time Management Strategy, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Weather Delays

TIME MANAGEMENT – Schedule Specification Implementation (Part 3)

August 9, 2011 By George T McLaughlin PMP CCM

This Subject Series addresses the sources and implementation of a contract schedule specification. The Subject Series structure is and will be multiple parts and be a logical extension of the series titled MANAGING RISK OF DELAY.

The overview of this series is:

Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Preparation and Maintenance (Part 4)
Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Specification Sources and Implementation (Part 8)
Schedule Specification Implementation Overview (Part 2)
Making State of the Art Scheduling Specifications Work (presented in multiple parts).

The balance of this post and subsequent ones in this series are/will be from the paper. In general, this informative work compares two approaches to schedule specification implementation.

This extract from the paper covers:

WHO OWNS THE FLOAT?
THE RIGHT TO FINISH EARLY
WARNING (understanding of value and commitment)
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE SUBMITTAL [Read more…]

Filed Under: Claims, Featured, General, Projects Tagged With: concurrent delay, Construction Contract Planning and Scheduling, construction time management, Corps of Engineers, CPM, CPM scheduling, Delay, Float, Float Ownership, liquidated damages, Managing risk of delay, Project Execution Plan, Project Execution Planning, Risk of Delay, Schedule Specification, Slack, Time Management, Time Management Strategy, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

TIME MANAGEMENT – Schedule Specification Implementation (Part 2)

August 4, 2011 By George T McLaughlin PMP CCM

This Subject Series addresses the sources and implementation of a contract schedule specification. The Subject Series structure will be multiple parts and be a logical extension of the series titled MANAGING RISK OF DELAY.

The overview of this series is:

Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Preparation and Maintenance (Part 4)
Managing Risk of Delay – Schedule Specification Sources and Implementation (Part 8)
Overview (this post)
Paper by Making State of the Art Scheduling Specifications Work (presented in multiple parts).

The balance of this post and subsequent ones in this series are/will be from the paper. In general, this informative work compares two approaches to schedule specification implementation.

INTRODUCTION

The past decade has witnessed an explosion in affordable microcomputer-based scheduling software, a greater appreciation of the importance of CPM scheduling techniques in controlling time and cost, and a broader understanding of how to use these techniques within the construction industry. The past ten years have also seen an increase in CPM schedule related disputes ranging from entitlement to delay damages to termination for default for failing to perform according to the approved progress schedule. There are almost as many different scheduling specifications as there are construction contracts. Yet, as just one example, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps ofEngineers), the largest constructor in the world and a pioneer in requiring the use of CPM scheduling techniques on their projects, has not significantly changed its scheduling specification in the last ten years.

The Corps of Engineers scheduling specification has served as a model for many scheduling specifications in both the public and private sectors. Recently, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) adopted a major revision to the Corps specification. This paper examines some of the changes and the arguments that they’re designed to resolve. [Snip]. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Claims, Featured, General, Projects Tagged With: Construction Contract Planning and Scheduling, construction time management, Delay, DFW, George T. McLaughlin PMP, Managing risk of delay, McLaughlin & McLaughlin, NAS, National Analysis System, Project Execution Plan, Project Execution Planning, Risk of Delay, Schedule Specification, Time Management, Time Management Strategy, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

Labor Productivity and Disruption – Managerial Considerations

May 2, 2011 By George T McLaughlin PMP CCM

This is the seventh posting regarding labor productivity and disruption. The Subject Series can be viewed here. In large and complex projects, a prime contractor may or may not direct hire the field labor. Often, the field labor is hired by major subcontractors (contractors hired by prime contractor). Examples are civil, structural steel, mechanical, piping, electrical and controls.

For the prime contractor [or similarly for Owner/Employer], subcontractor productivity is seemingly not important or relevant. This is particularly true if the subcontractor in question is on a fixed price or fixed unit price contract. However, events that are created by Owner/Employer or Contractor that impact the subcontractor’s productivity create potential liabilities. Further, once the subcontractor discovers the loss, a claim is likely to emerge.

Consequently, positive action is needed. There is a legitimate need for the Owner/Employer and Contractor to be informed. Managerial overlay, visibility and attention are components in the overall project management challenge. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Productivity, Projects Tagged With: AACE International, Changed Work, Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), Construction Contract Claims, Construction Industry Institute (CII), Disruption, Field Labor Productivity, Mechanical Contractors Association of America (MCAA), National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA), Project Execution Plan, Project Management Institute (PMI), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

Search this Site